我有一个查询,使用select可以运行得更快,top 100
而没有则要慢得多top 100
。返回的记录数为0。能否解释查询计划中的差异或在解释差异的地方共享链接?
没有top
文本的查询:
SELECT --TOP 100
*
FROM InventTrans
JOIN
InventDim
ON InventDim.DATAAREAID = 'dat' AND
InventDim.INVENTDIMID = InventTrans.INVENTDIMID
WHERE InventTrans.DATAAREAID = 'dat' AND
InventTrans.ITEMID = '027743' AND
InventDim.INVENTLOCATIONID = 'КзРЦ Алмат' AND
InventDim.ECC_BUSINESSUNITID = 'Казахстан';
以上查询计划(不含top
):
IO和TIME统计信息(无top
):
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
(0 row(s) affected)
Table 'INVENTDIM'. Scan count 0, logical reads 988297, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 1, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
Table 'INVENTTRANS'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1234560, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 14299, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
(1 row(s) affected)
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 6256 ms, elapsed time = 13348 ms.
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
使用的索引(无top
):
1. INVENTTRANS.I_177TRANSIDIDX
4 KEYS:
- DATAAREAID
- INVENTTRANSID
- INVENTDIMID
- RECID
2. INVENTTRANS.I_177ITEMIDX
3 KEYS:
- DATAAREAID
- ITEMID
- DATEPHYSICAL
3. INVENTDIM.I_698DIMIDIDX
2 KEYS:
- DATAAREAID
- INVENTDIMID
查询top
:
SELECT TOP 100
*
FROM InventTrans
JOIN
InventDim
ON InventDim.DATAAREAID = 'dat' AND
InventDim.INVENTDIMID = InventTrans.INVENTDIMID
WHERE InventTrans.DATAAREAID = 'dat' AND
InventTrans.ITEMID = '027743' AND
InventDim.INVENTLOCATIONID = 'КзРЦ Алмат' AND
InventDim.ECC_BUSINESSUNITID = 'Казахстан';
查询计划(带有TOP):
查询IO和TIME统计信息(带有TOP):
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
(0 row(s) affected)
Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
Table 'INVENTTRANS'. Scan count 15385, logical reads 82542, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
Table 'INVENTDIM'. Scan count 1, logical reads 62704, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
(1 row(s) affected)
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 265 ms, elapsed time = 257 ms.
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
使用的索引(带有TOP):
1. INVENTTRANS.I_177TRANSIDIDX
4 KEYS:
- DATAAREAID
- INVENTTRANSID
- INVENTDIMID
- RECID
2. INVENTTRANS.I_177DIMIDIDX
3 KEYS:
- DATAAREAID
- INVENTDIMID
- ITEMID
3. INVENTDIM.I_698DIMIDIDX
2 KEYS:
- DATAAREAID
- INVENTDIMID
4. INVENTDIM.I_698ECC_BUSUNITLOCIDX
3 KEYS
- DATAAREAID
- ECC_BUSINESSUNITID
- INVENTLOCATIONID
非常感谢您对此主题的任何帮助!
2
我认为没有“ ORDER BY”的情况下“ TOP”的速度并不重要。正确的结果比速度更重要。
—
丹·古兹曼
相关:可能是重复的TOP如何(以及为什么)影响执行计划?
—
保罗·怀特