错误的F ********空间关系?(我没有在骂)


13

我希望ISpatialFilter.SpatialRelDescriptionIRelationalOperator.Relation保持一致。但是,当我运行下面的代码时,我得到:

    Total features : 44368
    Count1: 9 T********
    Count2: 9 T********
    Count1: 21 F********
    Count2: 44359 F********
    Count1: 1 ******F**
    Count2: 1 ******F**

这是F********关系中的错误吗?

private void TestSpatialFilter()
{
    IMxDocument mxdoc = ((IApplication)m_application).Document as IMxDocument;
    IFeatureLayer fLayer = mxdoc.FocusMap.get_Layer(0) as IFeatureLayer;
    IEnvelope env = ((IActiveView)mxdoc.FocusMap).Extent;
    env.Expand(0.5, 0.5, true);
    env.Project(((IGeoDataset)fLayer.FeatureClass).SpatialReference);
    Debug.Print("Total features : {0}", fLayer.FeatureClass.FeatureCount(null));
    IFeatureClass fc = fLayer.FeatureClass;
    string[] rels = { "T********", "F********", "******F**" };
    foreach (string rel in rels)
    {
        Debug.Print("Count1: {0} {1}", Count1(fc, env, rel), rel);
        Debug.Print("Count2: {0} {1}", Count2(fc, env, rel), rel);
    }
}

public static int Count1(IFeatureClass fc, IGeometry geom,  string relDescription)
{
    ISpatialFilter sf = new SpatialFilterClass();
    sf.SpatialRel = esriSpatialRelEnum.esriSpatialRelRelation;
    sf.SpatialRelDescription = relDescription;
    sf.Geometry = geom;
    int i = fc.FeatureCount(sf);
    Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject(sf);
    return i;
}
public static int Count2(IFeatureClass fc, IGeometry geom, string relDescription)
{
    int i = 0;
    string relation = String.Format("RELATE(G1,G2,'{0}')", relDescription);
    IRelationalOperator relOp = geom as IRelationalOperator;

    IFeatureCursor fCur = fc.Search(null, false);
    IFeature feat;
    while ((feat = fCur.NextFeature()) != null)
    {
        if(relOp.Relation(feat.Shape,relation))
            i++;
    }
    Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject(fCur);
    return i;
}

1
抱歉,没有答案,但地理空间幽默+1
bFlood 2010年

Answers:


3

这似乎有点奇怪。也许只用很少的特定操作(例如:相交,不相交等)进行了测试?是什么FF*FF****(逆T********)为您做什么?我似乎记得,在内部版本中没有使用过几个版本,所以这并不令我感到惊讶。


1
这似乎有效。如果空间如此特别,那么似乎可以接受更好的质量检查。
Kirk Kuykendall,2010年
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required.