我看到一些可能导致脚本运行缓慢的情况。可能很慢的是arcpy.CalculateField_management()功能。您应该使用光标，它会快几个数量级。另外，您说的是使用ArcGIS Desktop 10.3.1，但是使用的是旧的ArcGIS 10.0样式的游标，游标的速度也慢得多。
即使在200K的列表上，min（）操作也会非常快。您可以通过运行以下小片段来验证这一点；它发生在眨眼之间：
>>> min(range(200000)) # will return 0, but is still checking a list of 200,000 values very quickly
看看这是否更快：
import arcpy
fc = arcpy.env.workspace = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0)
Xfield = "XKoordInt"
with arcpy.da.SearchCursor(fc, [Xfield]) as rows:
ListVal = [r[0] for r in rows]
value = min(ListVal) - 20
print value
# now update
with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(fc, [Xfield, 'Matrix_Z']) as rows:
for r in rows:
if r[0] is not None:
r[1] = (r[0] - value) / 20.0
rows.updateRow(r)
编辑：
我进行了一些计时测试，而且我怀疑，现场计算器花的时间几乎是新型光标的两倍。有趣的是，旧式光标比字段计算器慢3倍。我创建了200,000个随机点，并使用了相同的字段名称。
装饰器函数用于为每个函数计时（可能在设置和拆除函数时会花费一些时间，因此timeit模块测试代码片段的准确性会更高一些）。
结果如下：
Getting the values with the old style cursor: 0:00:19.23
Getting values with the new style cursor: 0:00:02.50
Getting values with the new style cursor + an order by sql statement: 0:00:00.02
And the calculations:
field calculator: 0:00:14.21
old style update cursor: 0:00:42.47
new style cursor: 0:00:08.71
这是我使用的代码（将所有内容分解为单个功能以使用timeit装饰器）：
import arcpy
import datetime
import sys
import os
def timeit(function):
"""will time a function's execution time
Required:
function -- full namespace for a function
Optional:
args -- list of arguments for function
kwargs -- keyword arguments for function
"""
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
st = datetime.datetime.now()
output = function(*args, **kwargs)
elapsed = str(datetime.datetime.now()-st)[:-4]
if hasattr(function, 'im_class'):
fname = '.'.join([function.im_class.__name__, function.__name__])
else:
fname = function.__name__
print'"{0}" from {1} Complete - Elapsed time: {2}'.format(fname, sys.modules[function.__module__], elapsed)
return output
return wrapper
@timeit
def get_value_min_old_cur(fc, field):
rows = arcpy.SearchCursor(fc)
return min([r.getValue(field) for r in rows])
@timeit
def get_value_min_new_cur(fc, field):
with arcpy.da.SearchCursor(fc, [field]) as rows:
return min([r[0] for r in rows])
@timeit
def get_value_sql(fc, field):
"""good suggestion to use sql order by by dslamb :) """
wc = "%s IS NOT NULL"%field
sc = (None,'Order By %s'%field)
with arcpy.da.SearchCursor(fc, [field]) as rows:
for r in rows:
# should give us the min on the first record
return r[0]
@timeit
def test_field_calc(fc, field, expression):
arcpy.management.CalculateField(fc, field, expression, 'PYTHON')
@timeit
def old_cursor_calc(fc, xfield, matrix_field, value):
wc = "%s IS NOT NULL"%xfield
rows = arcpy.UpdateCursor(fc, where_clause=wc)
for row in rows:
if row.getValue(xfield) is not None:
row.setValue(matrix_field, (row.getValue(xfield) - value) / 20)
rows.updateRow(row)
@timeit
def new_cursor_calc(fc, xfield, matrix_field, value):
wc = "%s IS NOT NULL"%xfield
with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(fc, [xfield, matrix_field], where_clause=wc) as rows:
for r in rows:
r[1] = (r[0] - value) / 20
rows.updateRow(r)
if __name__ == '__main__':
Xfield = "XKoordInt"
Mfield = 'Matrix_Z'
fc = r'C:\Users\calebma\Documents\ArcGIS\Default.gdb\Random_Points'
# first test the speed of getting the value
print 'getting value tests...'
value = get_value_min_old_cur(fc, Xfield)
value = get_value_min_new_cur(fc, Xfield)
value = get_value_sql(fc, Xfield)
print '\n\nmin value is {}\n\n'.format(value)
# now test field calculations
expression = "(!XKoordInt!-{0})/20".format(value)
test_field_calc(fc, Xfield, expression)
old_cursor_calc(fc, Xfield, Mfield, value)
new_cursor_calc(fc, Xfield, Mfield, value)
最后，这是从控制台实际输出的内容。
>>>
getting value tests...
"get_value_min_old_cur" from <module '__main__' from 'C:/Users/calebma/Desktop/speed_test2.py'> Complete - Elapsed time: 0:00:19.23
"get_value_min_new_cur" from <module '__main__' from 'C:/Users/calebma/Desktop/speed_test2.py'> Complete - Elapsed time: 0:00:02.50
"get_value_sql" from <module '__main__' from 'C:/Users/calebma/Desktop/speed_test2.py'> Complete - Elapsed time: 0:00:00.02
min value is 5393879
"test_field_calc" from <module '__main__' from 'C:/Users/calebma/Desktop/speed_test2.py'> Complete - Elapsed time: 0:00:14.21
"old_cursor_calc" from <module '__main__' from 'C:/Users/calebma/Desktop/speed_test2.py'> Complete - Elapsed time: 0:00:42.47
"new_cursor_calc" from <module '__main__' from 'C:/Users/calebma/Desktop/speed_test2.py'> Complete - Elapsed time: 0:00:08.71
>>>
编辑2：刚刚发布了一些更新的测试，我发现我的timeit功能有轻微缺陷。