我有一个类型的变量 std::string
。我想检查它是否包含某个std::string
。我该怎么做?
是否存在一个函数,如果找到该字符串,则返回true;否则,返回false?
std::basic_string::contains
到stdlib。
我有一个类型的变量 std::string
。我想检查它是否包含某个std::string
。我该怎么做?
是否存在一个函数,如果找到该字符串,则返回true;否则,返回false?
std::basic_string::contains
到stdlib。
Answers:
用法std::string::find
如下:
if (s1.find(s2) != std::string::npos) {
std::cout << "found!" << '\n';
}
注意:“找到了!” 如果s2
是s1
,s1
和的子字符串,且s2
类型为,将被打印std::string
。
实际上,您可以尝试使用boost库,我认为std :: string没有提供足够的方法来执行所有常见的字符串操作。在boost中,您可以仅使用boost::algorithm::contains
:
#include <string>
#include <boost/algorithm/string.hpp>
int main() {
std::string s("gengjiawen");
std::string t("geng");
bool b = boost::algorithm::contains(s, t);
std::cout << b << std::endl;
return 0;
}
find
方法可以准确地解决所讨论的任务。无需引入库依赖性。
contains
is std::contains
还是boost::contains
,这似乎是一个重大缺陷。我猜std :: contains当前不存在,但是我不确定假设读者已经记住了std中的所有内容是否合理。并且std::contains
可能会在将来的c ++版本中存在,这可能会破坏该程序。
如果功能对于您的系统至关重要,则使用旧strstr
方法实际上是有益的。其中的std::search
方法algorithm
是最慢的。我的猜测是创建这些迭代器会花费很多时间。
我用来计时整个事情的代码是
#include <string>
#include <cstring>
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <random>
#include <chrono>
std::string randomString( size_t len );
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
using namespace std::chrono;
const size_t haystacksCount = 200000;
std::string haystacks[haystacksCount];
std::string needle = "hello";
bool sink = true;
high_resolution_clock::time_point start, end;
duration<double> timespan;
int sizes[10] = { 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280, 5120, 10240 };
for(int s=0; s<10; ++s)
{
std::cout << std::endl << "Generating " << haystacksCount << " random haystacks of size " << sizes[s] << std::endl;
for(size_t i=0; i<haystacksCount; ++i)
{
haystacks[i] = randomString(sizes[s]);
}
std::cout << "Starting std::string.find approach" << std::endl;
start = high_resolution_clock::now();
for(size_t i=0; i<haystacksCount; ++i)
{
if(haystacks[i].find(needle) != std::string::npos)
{
sink = !sink; // useless action
}
}
end = high_resolution_clock::now();
timespan = duration_cast<duration<double>>(end-start);
std::cout << "Processing of " << haystacksCount << " elements took " << timespan.count() << " seconds." << std::endl;
std::cout << "Starting strstr approach" << std::endl;
start = high_resolution_clock::now();
for(size_t i=0; i<haystacksCount; ++i)
{
if(strstr(haystacks[i].c_str(), needle.c_str()))
{
sink = !sink; // useless action
}
}
end = high_resolution_clock::now();
timespan = duration_cast<duration<double>>(end-start);
std::cout << "Processing of " << haystacksCount << " elements took " << timespan.count() << " seconds." << std::endl;
std::cout << "Starting std::search approach" << std::endl;
start = high_resolution_clock::now();
for(size_t i=0; i<haystacksCount; ++i)
{
if(std::search(haystacks[i].begin(), haystacks[i].end(), needle.begin(), needle.end()) != haystacks[i].end())
{
sink = !sink; // useless action
}
}
end = high_resolution_clock::now();
timespan = duration_cast<duration<double>>(end-start);
std::cout << "Processing of " << haystacksCount << " elements took " << timespan.count() << " seconds." << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
std::string randomString( size_t len)
{
static const char charset[] = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
static const int charsetLen = sizeof(charset) - 1;
static std::default_random_engine rng(std::random_device{}());
static std::uniform_int_distribution<> dist(0, charsetLen);
auto randChar = [charset, &dist, &rng]() -> char
{
return charset[ dist(rng) ];
};
std::string result(len, 0);
std::generate_n(result.begin(), len, randChar);
return result;
}
在这里,我生成随机数haystacks
并在其中搜索needle
。设置了干草堆计数,但是每个干草堆中字符串的长度从开始的10增加到最后的10240。程序大部分时间实际上是在生成随机字符串,但这是可以预期的。
输出为:
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 10
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.00358503 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0022727 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0346258 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 20
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.00480959 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.00236199 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0586416 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 40
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0082571 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.00341435 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0952996 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 80
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0148288 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.00399263 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.175945 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 160
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0293496 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.00504251 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.343452 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 320
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0522893 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.00850485 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.64133 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 640
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.102082 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.00925799 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 1.26321 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 1280
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.208057 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0105039 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 2.57404 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 5120
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.798496 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0137969 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 10.3573 seconds.
Generating 200000 random haystacks of size 10240
Starting std::string.find approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 1.58171 seconds.
Starting strstr approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 0.0143111 seconds.
Starting std::search approach
Processing of 200000 elements took 20.4163 seconds.
如果您不想使用标准库函数,下面是一种解决方案。
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
bool CheckSubstring(std::string firstString, std::string secondString){
if(secondString.size() > firstString.size())
return false;
for (int i = 0; i < firstString.size(); i++){
int j = 0;
// If the first characters match
if(firstString[i] == secondString[j]){
int k = i;
while (firstString[i] == secondString[j] && j < secondString.size()){
j++;
i++;
}
if (j == secondString.size())
return true;
else // Re-initialize i to its original value
i = k;
}
}
return false;
}
int main(){
std::string firstString, secondString;
std::cout << "Enter first string:";
std::getline(std::cin, firstString);
std::cout << "Enter second string:";
std::getline(std::cin, secondString);
if(CheckSubstring(firstString, secondString))
std::cout << "Second string is a substring of the frist string.\n";
else
std::cout << "Second string is not a substring of the first string.\n";
return 0;
}
CheckSubstring(std::string firstString, std::string secondString)
深度复制传递给函数的两个字符串,这很昂贵,尤其是对于需要堆分配的较长字符串而言。另外,说你叫CheckSubstring("XYZab", "ab\0\0")
-的while
循环将结束比较a
到a
,b
要b
在第一个字符串在第二明确NUL结束隐含NUL,那么它会读取超出第一个字符串的缓冲区,有不确定的行为。要修复,请使用for (...
i <= firstString.size()-secondString()。size(); ...)`。
如果字符串的大小相对较大(数百个字节或更多),并且可以使用c ++ 17,则可能要使用Boyer-Moore-Horspool搜索器(来自cppreference.com的示例):
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>
int main()
{
std::string in = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit,"
" sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua";
std::string needle = "pisci";
auto it = std::search(in.begin(), in.end(),
std::boyer_moore_searcher(
needle.begin(), needle.end()));
if(it != in.end())
std::cout << "The string " << needle << " found at offset "
<< it - in.begin() << '\n';
else
std::cout << "The string " << needle << " not found\n";
}
bool contains(const std::string& haystack, const std::string& needle)
。如今,他们提供了一套益智作品集,这些作品以一些晦涩的论文作者来命名,以使其看起来更像计算机科学……
您还可以使用系统名称空间。然后,您可以使用contains方法。
#include <iostream>
using namespace System;
int main(){
String ^ wholeString = "My name is Malindu";
if(wholeString->ToLower()->Contains("malindu")){
std::cout<<"Found";
}
else{
std::cout<<"Not Found";
}
}
这是一个简单的功能
bool find(string line, string sWord)
{
bool flag = false;
int index = 0, i, helper = 0;
for (i = 0; i < line.size(); i++)
{
if (sWord.at(index) == line.at(i))
{
if (flag == false)
{
flag = true;
helper = i;
}
index++;
}
else
{
flag = false;
index = 0;
}
if (index == sWord.size())
{
break;
}
}
if ((i+1-helper) == index)
{
return true;
}
return false;
}
#include <algorithm> // std::search
#include <string>
using std::search; using std::count; using std::string;
int main() {
string mystring = "The needle in the haystack";
string str = "needle";
string::const_iterator it;
it = search(mystring.begin(), mystring.end(),
str.begin(), str.end()) != mystring.end();
// if string is found... returns iterator to str's first element in mystring
// if string is not found... returns iterator to mystring.end()
if (it != mystring.end())
// string is found
else
// not found
return 0;
}
using
仅使用必需的功能而不将整个名称空间转储到全局空间中。至于@SᴀᴍOnᴇᴌᴀ注释,我想用户没有阅读您代码中的注释。
从这个网站上的很多答案中,我没有找到一个明确的答案,所以在5-10分钟内,我自己弄清楚了答案。但这可以在两种情况下完成:
因此,假设我们在字符串“ abcde”中搜索子字符串“ cd”,并使用C ++中最简单的substr内置函数
1:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int i;
int main()
{
string a = "abcde";
string b = a.substr(2,2); // 2 will be c. Why? because we start counting from 0 in a string, not from 1.
cout << "substring of a is: " << b << endl;
return 0;
}
2:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int i;
int main()
{
string a = "abcde";
for (i=0;i<a.length(); i++)
{
if (a.substr(i,2) == "cd")
{
cout << "substring of a is: " << a.substr(i,2) << endl; // i will iterate from 0 to 5 and will display the substring only when the condition is fullfilled
}
}
return 0;
}
我们可以改用这种方法。只是我的项目中的一个例子。请参阅代码。还包括一些其他功能。
查看if语句!
/*
Every C++ program should have an entry point. Usually, this is the main function.
Every C++ Statement ends with a ';' (semi-colon)
But, pre-processor statements do not have ';'s at end.
Also, every console program can be ended using "cin.get();" statement, so that the console won't exit instantly.
*/
#include <string>
#include <bits/stdc++.h> //Can Use instead of iostream. Also should be included to use the transform function.
using namespace std;
int main(){ //The main function. This runs first in every program.
string input;
while(input!="exit"){
cin>>input;
transform(input.begin(),input.end(),input.begin(),::tolower); //Converts to lowercase.
if(input.find("name") != std::string::npos){ //Gets a boolean value regarding the availability of the said text.
cout<<"My Name is AI \n";
}
if(input.find("age") != std::string::npos){
cout<<"My Age is 2 minutes \n";
}
}
}