检查一个类是否从泛型类派生

我的项目中有一个带有派生类的泛型类。

public class GenericClass<T> : GenericInterface<T>
{
}

public class Test : GenericClass<SomeType>
{
}

有没有办法找出Type对象是否源自GenericClass？

t.IsSubclassOf(typeof(GenericClass<>))

不起作用。

试试这个代码

static bool IsSubclassOfRawGeneric(Type generic, Type toCheck) {
    while (toCheck != null && toCheck != typeof(object)) {
        var cur = toCheck.IsGenericType ? toCheck.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : toCheck;
        if (generic == cur) {
            return true;
        }
        toCheck = toCheck.BaseType;
    }
    return false;
}

（由于大量重写而重新发布）

JaredPar的代码答案非常棒，但是我有一条提示，如果您的泛型类型不基于值类型参数，那么它就不必要了。我对为什么“ is”运算符不起作用感到困惑，所以我也记录了实验结果，以备将来参考。请增强此答案以进一步提高其清晰度。

小费：

如果确定您的GenericClass实现是从抽象的非泛型基类（例如GenericClassBase）继承的，那么您可以毫无疑问地问同样的问题，就像这样：

typeof(Test).IsSubclassOf(typeof(GenericClassBase))

IsSubclassOf（）

我的测试表明IsSubclassOf（）不适用于无参数的通用类型，例如

typeof(GenericClass<>)

而它将与

typeof(GenericClass<SomeType>)

因此，假设您愿意基于SomeType进行测试，以下代码将适用于GenericClass <>的任何派生：

typeof(Test).IsSubclassOf(typeof(GenericClass<SomeType>))

我只能想象您要通过GenericClass <>进行测试是在插件框架方案中。

关于“是”运算符的思考

在设计时，C＃不允许使用无参数泛型，因为在那时它们本质上不是完整的CLR类型。因此，必须使用参数声明泛型变量，这就是为什么“ is”运算符在处理对象方面如此强大的原因。顺便说一句，“ is”运算符也不能评估无参数的泛型类型。

“ is”运算符将测试整个继承链，包括接口。

因此，给定任何对象的实例，以下方法将解决问题：

bool IsTypeof<T>(object t)
{
    return (t is T);
}

这有点多余，但我认为我会继续为每个人可视化它。

给定

var t = new Test();

以下代码行将返回true：

bool test1 = IsTypeof<GenericInterface<SomeType>>(t);

bool test2 = IsTypeof<GenericClass<SomeType>>(t);

bool test3 = IsTypeof<Test>(t);

另一方面，我想，如果您想要特定于Ge​​nericClass的内容，可以使其更加具体：

bool IsTypeofGenericClass<SomeType>(object t)
{
    return (t is GenericClass<SomeType>);
}

然后，您将像这样进行测试：

bool test1 = IsTypeofGenericClass<SomeType>(t);

我研究了其中一些样本，发现在某些情况下缺少它们。该版本适用于所有种类的泛型：类型，接口及其类型定义。

public static bool InheritsOrImplements(this Type child, Type parent)
{
    parent = ResolveGenericTypeDefinition(parent);

    var currentChild = child.IsGenericType
                           ? child.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                           : child;

    while (currentChild != typeof (object))
    {
        if (parent == currentChild || HasAnyInterfaces(parent, currentChild))
            return true;

        currentChild = currentChild.BaseType != null
                       && currentChild.BaseType.IsGenericType
                           ? currentChild.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                           : currentChild.BaseType;

        if (currentChild == null)
            return false;
    }
    return false;
}

private static bool HasAnyInterfaces(Type parent, Type child)
{
    return child.GetInterfaces()
        .Any(childInterface =>
        {
            var currentInterface = childInterface.IsGenericType
                ? childInterface.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                : childInterface;

            return currentInterface == parent;
        });
}

private static Type ResolveGenericTypeDefinition(Type parent)
{
    var shouldUseGenericType = true;
    if (parent.IsGenericType && parent.GetGenericTypeDefinition() != parent)
        shouldUseGenericType = false;

    if (parent.IsGenericType && shouldUseGenericType)
        parent = parent.GetGenericTypeDefinition();
    return parent;
}

这也是单元测试：

protected interface IFooInterface
{
}

protected interface IGenericFooInterface<T>
{
}

protected class FooBase
{
}

protected class FooImplementor
    : FooBase, IFooInterface
{
}

protected class GenericFooBase
    : FooImplementor, IGenericFooInterface<object>
{

}

protected class GenericFooImplementor<T>
    : FooImplementor, IGenericFooInterface<T>
{
}


[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_non_generic_interface()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IFooInterface)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooBase)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass_not_caring_about_generic_type_parameter()
{
    Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_not_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass_not_caring_about_generic_type_parameter()
{
    Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)), Is.False);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_non_generic_class()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_any_base_type()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
}

在我看来，这种实现在更多情况下都可以工作（带有或不带有初始化参数的通用类和接口，而不管子代和参数的数量如何）：

public static class ReflexionExtension
{
    public static bool IsSubClassOfGeneric(this Type child, Type parent)
    {
        if (child == parent)
            return false;

        if (child.IsSubclassOf(parent))
            return true;

        var parameters = parent.GetGenericArguments();
        var isParameterLessGeneric = !(parameters != null && parameters.Length > 0 &&
            ((parameters[0].Attributes & TypeAttributes.BeforeFieldInit) == TypeAttributes.BeforeFieldInit));

        while (child != null && child != typeof(object))
        {
            var cur = GetFullTypeDefinition(child);
            if (parent == cur || (isParameterLessGeneric && cur.GetInterfaces().Select(i => GetFullTypeDefinition(i)).Contains(GetFullTypeDefinition(parent))))
                return true;
            else if (!isParameterLessGeneric)
                if (GetFullTypeDefinition(parent) == cur && !cur.IsInterface)
                {
                    if (VerifyGenericArguments(GetFullTypeDefinition(parent), cur))
                        if (VerifyGenericArguments(parent, child))
                            return true;
                }
                else
                    foreach (var item in child.GetInterfaces().Where(i => GetFullTypeDefinition(parent) == GetFullTypeDefinition(i)))
                        if (VerifyGenericArguments(parent, item))
                            return true;

            child = child.BaseType;
        }

        return false;
    }

    private static Type GetFullTypeDefinition(Type type)
    {
        return type.IsGenericType ? type.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : type;
    }

    private static bool VerifyGenericArguments(Type parent, Type child)
    {
        Type[] childArguments = child.GetGenericArguments();
        Type[] parentArguments = parent.GetGenericArguments();
        if (childArguments.Length == parentArguments.Length)
            for (int i = 0; i < childArguments.Length; i++)
                if (childArguments[i].Assembly != parentArguments[i].Assembly || childArguments[i].Name != parentArguments[i].Name || childArguments[i].Namespace != parentArguments[i].Namespace)
                    if (!childArguments[i].IsSubclassOf(parentArguments[i]))
                        return false;

        return true;
    }
}

这是我的70 76个测试用例：

[TestMethod]
public void IsSubClassOfGenericTest()
{
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGeneric<>)), " 1");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(WrongBaseGeneric<>)), " 2");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>)), " 3");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IWrongBaseGeneric<>)), " 4");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>)), " 5");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IWrongBaseGeneric<>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(ChildGeneric2<>)), " 6");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGeneric2<>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGeneric<>)), " 7");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGeneric2<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGeneric<>)), " 8");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGeneric<Class1>)), " 9");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(WrongBaseGeneric<Class1>)), "10");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>)), "11");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IWrongBaseGeneric<Class1>)), "12");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>)), "13");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(BaseGeneric<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(ChildGeneric2<Class1>)), "14");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGeneric2<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGeneric<Class1>)), "15");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(ChildGeneric)), "16");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IChildGeneric).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IChildGeneric)), "17");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IChildGeneric2<>)), "18");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGeneric2<>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>)), "19");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGeneric2<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>)), "20");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IChildGeneric2<Class1>)), "21");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGeneric2<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>)), "22");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGeneric<Class1>)), "23");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGeneric<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>)), "24");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGeneric<>)), "25");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGeneric<>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>)), "26");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGeneric<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>)), "27");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>)), "28");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGeneric2<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<Class1>)), "29");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGeneric2<>)), "30");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGeneric2<>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>)), "31");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGeneric2<Class1>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGeneric<>)), "32");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA<,>)), "33");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(WrongBaseGenericA<,>)), "34");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>)), "35");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IWrongBaseGenericA<,>)), "36");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>)), "37");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IWrongBaseGenericA<,>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(ChildGenericA2<,>)), "38");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA2<,>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA<,>)), "39");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA<,>)), "40");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "41");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(WrongBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "42");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "43");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IWrongBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "44");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "45");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(ChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>)), "46");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "47");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(ChildGenericA)), "48");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IChildGenericA).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IChildGenericA)), "49");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IChildGenericA2<,>)), "50");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGenericA2<,>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>)), "51");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>)), "52");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>)), "53");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(IChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "54");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "55");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "56");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA<,>)), "57");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGenericA<,>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>)), "58");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>)), "59");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "60");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "61");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA2<,>)), "62");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGenericA2<,>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>)), "63");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(BaseGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<,>)), "64");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(BaseGenericA2<ClassB, ClassA>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "65");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(BaseGenericA<ClassB, ClassA>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(ChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB>)), "66");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(BaseGenericA2<ClassB, ClassA>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB>)), "67");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA3<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "68");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA4<ClassA, ClassB>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "69");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA3<ClassB, ClassA>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "68-2");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA3<ClassA, ClassB2>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "68-3");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA3<ClassB2, ClassA>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(BaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "68-4");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA4<ClassB, ClassA>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "69-2");
    Assert.IsTrue(typeof(ChildGenericA4<ClassA, ClassB2>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "69-3");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(ChildGenericA4<ClassB2, ClassA>).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "69-4");
    Assert.IsFalse(typeof(bool).IsSubClassOfGeneric(typeof(IBaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC>)), "70");
}

测试的类和接口：

public class Class1 { }
public class BaseGeneric<T> : IBaseGeneric<T> { }
public class BaseGeneric2<T> : IBaseGeneric<T>, IInterfaceBidon { }
public interface IBaseGeneric<T> { }
public class ChildGeneric : BaseGeneric<Class1> { }
public interface IChildGeneric : IBaseGeneric<Class1> { }
public class ChildGeneric2<Class1> : BaseGeneric<Class1> { }
public interface IChildGeneric2<Class1> : IBaseGeneric<Class1> { }

public class WrongBaseGeneric<T> { }
public interface IWrongBaseGeneric<T> { }

public interface IInterfaceBidon { }

public class ClassA { }
public class ClassB { }
public class ClassC { }
public class ClassB2 : ClassB { }
public class BaseGenericA<T, U> : IBaseGenericA<T, U> { }
public class BaseGenericB<T, U, V> { }
public interface IBaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC> { }
public class BaseGenericA2<T, U> : IBaseGenericA<T, U>, IInterfaceBidonA { }
public interface IBaseGenericA<T, U> { }
public class ChildGenericA : BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB> { }
public interface IChildGenericA : IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB> { }
public class ChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB> : BaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB> { }
public class ChildGenericA3<ClassA, ClassB> : BaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC> { }
public class ChildGenericA4<ClassA, ClassB> : IBaseGenericB<ClassA, ClassB, ClassC> { }
public interface IChildGenericA2<ClassA, ClassB> : IBaseGenericA<ClassA, ClassB> { }

public class WrongBaseGenericA<T, U> { }
public interface IWrongBaseGenericA<T, U> { }

public interface IInterfaceBidonA { }

JaredPar的代码有效，但仅适用于一级继承。对于无限级别的继承，请使用以下代码

public bool IsTypeDerivedFromGenericType(Type typeToCheck, Type genericType)
{
    if (typeToCheck == typeof(object))
    {
        return false;
    }
    else if (typeToCheck == null)
    {
        return false;
    }
    else if (typeToCheck.IsGenericType && typeToCheck.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == genericType)
    {
        return true;
    }
    else
    {
        return IsTypeDerivedFromGenericType(typeToCheck.BaseType, genericType);
    }
}

这是我创建的一种用于检查对象是否源自特定类型的小方法。对我来说很棒！

internal static bool IsDerivativeOf(this Type t, Type typeToCompare)
{
    if (t == null) throw new NullReferenceException();
    if (t.BaseType == null) return false;

    if (t.BaseType == typeToCompare) return true;
    else return t.BaseType.IsDerivativeOf(typeToCompare);
}

可能有些矫kill过正，但是我使用如下扩展方法。他们检查接口以及子类。它还可以返回具有指定泛型定义的类型。

例如，问题中的示例可以针对通用接口以及通用类进行测试。返回的类型可用于GetGenericArguments确定通用参数类型为“ SomeType”。

/// <summary>
/// Checks whether this type has the specified definition in its ancestry.
/// </summary>   
public static bool HasGenericDefinition(this Type type, Type definition)
{
    return GetTypeWithGenericDefinition(type, definition) != null;
}

/// <summary>
/// Returns the actual type implementing the specified definition from the
/// ancestry of the type, if available. Else, null.
/// </summary>
public static Type GetTypeWithGenericDefinition(this Type type, Type definition)
{
    if (type == null)
        throw new ArgumentNullException("type");
    if (definition == null)
        throw new ArgumentNullException("definition");
    if (!definition.IsGenericTypeDefinition)
        throw new ArgumentException(
            "The definition needs to be a GenericTypeDefinition", "definition");

    if (definition.IsInterface)
        foreach (var interfaceType in type.GetInterfaces())
            if (interfaceType.IsGenericType
                && interfaceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == definition)
                return interfaceType;

    for (Type t = type; t != null; t = t.BaseType)
        if (t.IsGenericType && t.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == definition)
            return t;

    return null;
}

在上面由fir3rpho3nixx和David Schmitt做出的出色回答的基础上，我修改了他们的代码并添加了ShouldInheritOrImplementTypedGenericInterface测试（最后一个）。

    /// <summary>
    /// Find out if a child type implements or inherits from the parent type.
    /// The parent type can be an interface or a concrete class, generic or non-generic.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="child"></param>
    /// <param name="parent"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static bool InheritsOrImplements(this Type child, Type parent)
    {
        var currentChild = parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && child.IsGenericType ? child.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : child;

        while (currentChild != typeof(object))
        {
            if (parent == currentChild || HasAnyInterfaces(parent, currentChild))
                return true;

            currentChild = currentChild.BaseType != null && parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && currentChild.BaseType.IsGenericType
                                ? currentChild.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                                : currentChild.BaseType;

            if (currentChild == null)
                return false;
        }
        return false;
    }

    private static bool HasAnyInterfaces(Type parent, Type child)
    {
        return child.GetInterfaces().Any(childInterface =>
            {
                var currentInterface = parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && childInterface.IsGenericType
                    ? childInterface.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                    : childInterface;

                return currentInterface == parent;
            });

    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementNonGenericInterface()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IFooInterface)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterface()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooBase)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclass()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclassNotCaringAboutGenericTypeParameter()
    {
        Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldNotInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclassNotCaringAboutGenericTypeParameter()
    {
        Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)), Is.False);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementNonGenericClass()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementAnyBaseType()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementTypedGenericInterface()
    {
        GenericFooImplementor<int> obj = new GenericFooImplementor<int>();
        Type t = obj.GetType();

        Assert.IsTrue(t.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)));
        Assert.IsFalse(t.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<String>)));
    } 

使用linq可以轻松完成所有操作。这将找到作为通用基类GenericBaseType的子类的任何类型。

    IEnumerable<Type> allTypes = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes();

    IEnumerable<Type> mySubclasses = allTypes.Where(t => t.BaseType != null 
                                                            && t.BaseType.IsGenericType
                                                            && t.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(GenericBaseType<,>));

简单的解决方案：只需创建第二个非泛型接口并将其添加到泛型类：

public interface IGenericClass
{
}

public class GenericClass<T> : GenericInterface<T>, IGenericClass
{
}

然后，只需检查以任何方式你喜欢使用is，as，IsAssignableFrom，等。

if (thing is IGenericClass)
{
    // Do work
{

显然只有在您能够编辑通用类（OP似乎具有）的情况下才可能，但是与使用隐式扩展方法相比，它更优雅，更易读。

添加到@jaredpar的答案中，这是我用来检查接口的内容：

public static bool IsImplementerOfRawGeneric(this Type type, Type toCheck)
{
    if (toCheck.GetTypeInfo().IsClass)
    {
        return false;
    }

    return type.GetInterfaces().Any(interfaceType =>
    {
        var current = interfaceType.GetTypeInfo().IsGenericType ?
                    interfaceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : interfaceType;
        return current == toCheck;
    });
}

public static bool IsSubTypeOfRawGeneric(this Type type, Type toCheck)
{
    return type.IsInterface ?
          IsImplementerOfRawGeneric(type, toCheck)
        : IsSubclassOfRawGeneric(type, toCheck);
}

例如：

Console.WriteLine(typeof(IList<>).IsSubTypeOfRawGeneric(typeof(IList<int>))); // true

JaredPar，

如果我通过typeof（type <>）作为toCheck，这对我不起作用。这就是我所做的更改。

static bool IsSubclassOfRawGeneric(Type generic, Type toCheck) {
    while (toCheck != typeof(object)) {
        var cur = toCheck.IsGenericType ? toCheck.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : toCheck;
          if (cur.IsGenericType && generic.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == cur.GetGenericTypeDefinition()) {
            return true;
        }
        toCheck = toCheck.BaseType;
    }
    return false;
}

@EnocNRoll-Ananda Gopal的答案很有趣，但是如果事前没有实例化实例或者您想使用泛型类型定义进行检查，我建议使用以下方法：

public static bool TypeIs(this Type x, Type d) {
    if(null==d) {
        return false;
    }

    for(var c = x; null!=c; c=c.BaseType) {
        var a = c.GetInterfaces();

        for(var i = a.Length; i-->=0;) {
            var t = i<0 ? c : a[i];

            if(t==d||t.IsGenericType&&t.GetGenericTypeDefinition()==d) {
                return true;
            }
        }
    }

    return false;
}

并像这样使用它：

var b = typeof(char[]).TypeIs(typeof(IList<>)); // true

当有t（同时要测试的）和d都是泛型类型时，有四种条件情况，t==d其中涉及两种情况：（1）既不是泛型定义，t也不d是泛型定义；或者（2）两者都是泛型定义。其余情况之一就是通用定义，只有当d已经是通用定义时，我们才有机会说a t是ad，反之亦然。

它应该与要测试的任意类或接口一起使用，并返回类似于使用is运算符测试该类型的实例的结果。

Type _type = myclass.GetType();
PropertyInfo[] _propertyInfos = _type.GetProperties();
Boolean _test = _propertyInfos[0].PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() 
== typeof(List<>);

您可以尝试此扩展

    public static bool IsSubClassOfGenericClass(this Type type, Type genericClass,Type t)
    {
        return type.IsSubclassOf(genericClass.MakeGenericType(new[] { t }));
    }

在这个游戏上迟到了...我也对JarodPar的答案有另一个排列。

这是Type.IsSubClassOf（Type）由反射器提供：

    public virtual bool IsSubclassOf(Type c)
    {
        Type baseType = this;
        if (!(baseType == c))
        {
            while (baseType != null)
            {
                if (baseType == c)
                {
                    return true;
                }
                baseType = baseType.BaseType;
            }
            return false;
        }
        return false;
    }

从中可以看出，它并没有做太多事情，类似于JaredPar的迭代方法。到目前为止，一切都很好。这是我的版本（免责声明：未经全面测试，因此，如果您发现问题，请告诉我）

    public static bool IsExtension(this Type thisType, Type potentialSuperType)
    {
        //
        // protect ya neck
        //
        if (thisType == null || potentialSuperType == null || thisType == potentialSuperType) return false;

        //
        // don't need to traverse inheritance for interface extension, so check/do these first
        //
        if (potentialSuperType.IsInterface)
        {
            foreach (var interfaceType in thisType.GetInterfaces())
            {
                var tempType = interfaceType.IsGenericType ? interfaceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : interfaceType;

                if (tempType == potentialSuperType)
                {
                    return true;
                }
            }
        }

        //
        // do the concrete type checks, iterating up the inheritance chain, as in orignal
        //
        while (thisType != null && thisType != typeof(object))
        {
            var cur = thisType.IsGenericType ? thisType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : thisType;

            if (potentialSuperType == cur)
            {
                return true;
            }

            thisType = thisType.BaseType;
        }
        return false;
    }

基本上，这只是System.Type的扩展方法-我这样做是为了有意地将“ thisType”类型限制为具体类型，因为我的直接用法是针对LINQ查询“ where”谓词针对Type对象。我敢肯定，如果您需要的话，所有聪明的人都可以将其分解为一种高效的，通用的静态方法：)代码可以做一些事情，答案的代码却没有

1. 开放到一般的“扩展”-我正在考虑继承（思考类）以及实现（接口）；方法和参数名称已更改以更好地反映这一点
2. 输入null验证（meah）
3. 相同类型的输入（类不能扩展自身）
4. 如果相关Type是接口，则执行短路；因为GetInterfaces（）返回所有已实现的接口（甚至是在超类中实现的接口），所以您可以简单地遍历该集合，而不必爬上继承树

其余的基本上与JaredPar的代码相同