使用nfsstat -c
,我在NFS客户端PC上看到了很高的“ authrefrsh”(在某些系统上称为“ newcred”),对于诸如此类的操作ls
以及find
包含约1000个文件的目录的操作。这与非常差的性能(超过20分钟的目录列表)相关。缓存的NFS操作不表现出此行为(authrefrsh或减慢)。
authrefrsh =每次我检查nfsstat时都会调用:
$ nfsstat -c
Client rpc stats:
calls retrans authrefrsh
280462 0 280462
Client nfs v3:
null getattr setattr lookup access readlink
0 0% 126990 45% 0 0% 10062 3% 58592 20% 0 0%
read write create mkdir symlink mknod
25030 8% 0 0% 65 0% 0 0% 2 0% 0 0%
remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 59654 21%
fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit
0 0% 20 0% 10 0% 0 0%
连接详细信息:
$ mount.nfs -v nfshost:/share/dir /somedir
mount.nfs: timeout set for Tue Feb 21 18:12:18 2012
mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=4,addr=192.168.xx.xx,clientaddr=192.168.xx.xx'
mount.nfs: mount(2): Operation not permitted
mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'addr=192.168.xx.xx'
mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6
mount.nfs: trying 192.168.xx.xx prog 100003 vers 3 prot TCP port 2049
mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=3, prot=17
mount.nfs: trying 192.168.xx.xx prog 100005 vers 3 prot UDP port 1011
nfshost:/share/dir on /somedir type nfs
nfshost RPC环境:
$ rpcinfo -T udp nfshost nfs
program 100003 version 2 ready and waiting
program 100003 version 3 ready and waiting
program 100003 version 4 ready and waiting
$ rpcinfo -T udp nfshost mountd
program 100005 version 1 ready and waiting
program 100005 version 2 ready and waiting
program 100005 version 3 ready and waiting
$ rpcinfo -T udp nfshost nlockmgr
program 100021 version 1 ready and waiting
rpcinfo: RPC: Program/version mismatch; low version = 1, high version = 4
program 100021 version 2 is not available
program 100021 version 3 ready and waiting
program 100021 version 4 ready and waiting
$ rpcinfo -T udp nfshost llockmgr
rpcinfo: RPC: Program not registered
$ rpcinfo nfshost
program version netid address service owner
100000 2 tcp 0.0.0.0.0.111 portmapper unknown
100000 2 udp 0.0.0.0.0.111 portmapper unknown
100024 1 udp 0.0.0.0.2.212 status unknown
100024 1 tcp 0.0.0.0.2.215 status unknown
100021 1 udp 0.0.0.0.226.67 nlockmgr unknown
100021 3 udp 0.0.0.0.226.67 nlockmgr unknown
100021 4 udp 0.0.0.0.226.67 nlockmgr unknown
100021 1 tcp 0.0.0.0.134.55 nlockmgr unknown
100021 3 tcp 0.0.0.0.134.55 nlockmgr unknown
100021 4 tcp 0.0.0.0.134.55 nlockmgr unknown
100011 1 udp 0.0.0.0.3.230 rquotad unknown
100011 2 udp 0.0.0.0.3.230 rquotad unknown
100011 1 tcp 0.0.0.0.3.233 rquotad unknown
100011 2 tcp 0.0.0.0.3.233 rquotad unknown
100003 2 udp 0.0.0.0.8.1 nfs unknown
100003 3 udp 0.0.0.0.8.1 nfs unknown
100003 4 udp 0.0.0.0.8.1 nfs unknown
100003 2 tcp 0.0.0.0.8.1 nfs unknown
100003 3 tcp 0.0.0.0.8.1 nfs unknown
100003 4 tcp 0.0.0.0.8.1 nfs unknown
100005 1 udp 0.0.0.0.3.243 mountd unknown
100005 1 tcp 0.0.0.0.3.246 mountd unknown
100005 2 udp 0.0.0.0.3.243 mountd unknown
100005 2 tcp 0.0.0.0.3.246 mountd unknown
100005 3 udp 0.0.0.0.3.243 mountd unknown
100005 3 tcp 0.0.0.0.3.246 mountd unknown
环境:
$ uname -a
Linux whiteheat 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 20 17:23:00 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ mount.nfs a b -V
mount.nfs: (linux nfs-utils 1.2.4)
任何更新?我注意到带有较新内核(例如SLES 11 SP2和CentOS 6.4与SLES 9 SP4)的nfs客户端的性能较差。我在统计资料中看到的唯一区别是authrefrsh非常高。我假设这是造成性能下降的额外开销。
—
巴涅尔
没有更新,对不起。对于我的应用程序,我已不再使用NFS,因为可以选择使用SSH + SCP。问题令人担忧:)
—
克里斯·贝蒂
您确定不是nfs v3与v4问题?
—
kofemann
FYI这与UNIX SE问题,在这个问题上更多的线索: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/13557/...
—
Banjer
有关错误历史的更多信息,请访问:bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785931
—
Deer Hunter