LIGO实际看到了什么?(引力波发现)


32

我试图找到LIGO实际看到的原始视频/图像,但我只能找到艺术家对引力波的再现。


8
正如我在下面的答案中所讨论的,LIGO更像是麦克风,而不是照相机。因此,谈论我们听到的内容而不是看到的内容更有意义。您可以在此处收听信号:youtube.com/watch?v=TWqhUANNFXw
克里斯·穆勒

更好的比喻是地震仪吗?
user151841 '16

3
@ user151841并非如此。地震仪具有三个输出数据流:x,y和z中的加速度。另外,我认为与非地震仪相比,非科学公众更直观地熟悉麦克风。LIGO探测器还特别适合与麦克风进行比较,因为探测器的敏感频段完全在人的听觉范围内。
克里斯·穆勒

如果我们想要学脚,从技术上讲,LIGO的测量是使用实际摄像机拍摄的实际视频。他们所做的就是连续摄取复合激光器干涉图样的视频。要生成以下答案中的图,必须进行大量的数学处理。因此,实际上视频就是他们真正看到的。
zephyr

肯定有人将音频 “混音”为可听的音频吗?那家伙在哪 聆听它,了解起音/衰减/长度等感觉真是太棒了。确定存在吗?您要做的就是将其调制成多个八度,对吗?
Fattie

Answers:


34

实际的图像并不多。我能够从Science那里找到它,这就是全部:

enter image description here

从两个不同的观测所看到的时间略有不同,这只是一个涟漪。通过根据他们所在位置的光差速度进行移动,可以完美地适应这种移动。因此就是引力波的证明。

应该注意的是,有两个仪器的原因是为了对其他振动源进行交叉检查。每个天文台都通过探测4 km规模的振动来工作,振动幅度很小(质子宽度为1 / 10,000)。当将两者进行比较时,可以假定信号必须来自非本地信号源,只有重力波符合该定义。



12
“实际图像不多”,“仅此而已”。您的语气低估了IMO;)的真实程度。当然,我有点偏见。
克里斯·穆勒

两个观测位置如何相对于共享时钟或公共时钟协调它们的时间?他们是否在指相同的原子钟并对“等待时间”(获取时间所需的时间)进行调整?
TRomano '16

3
@TRomano We use GPS which is accurate to 10s of nanoseconds. You can read more about the aLIGO timing system here: authors.library.caltech.edu/20471/1/…
Chris Mueller

1
@ChrisMueller: I suspected it was GPS, but didn't have time to look it up at that moment. Thanks!
PearsonArtPhoto

26

首先,我认为您的问题掩盖了对LIGO天文台性质的误解。检测器的性质是,它们的作用类似于麦克风,而不是照相机。这意味着它们对来自大多数方向的引力波很敏感,但没有能力区分这些波的来源。通过使用多个检测器(这对于确定性检测也是必需的),可以使用检测器之间的时间差来提供有关源位置的一些信息。这也意味着检测器的输出是单个数据流。

这张来自《 Physical Review Letters》(不在付费专栏后面)的论文的图像比目前接受的答案更好地总结了LIGO听到的内容。我将从上到下解释窗格。

  1. 顶部窗格显示了在两个检测器中测得的“原始”信号,其中H1数据叠加在右侧的L1数据上。
  2. 第二行窗格显示了广​​义相对论(爱因斯坦理论)对引力波预测的多种不同模拟。这些模拟是LIGO能够声称他们知道该波是由两个合并的黑洞引起的。
  3. 窗格的第三行是“原始”数据减去模拟。
  4. The bottom panes are simply another way of plotting the 'raw' data called a time-frequency plot. Time is on the x axis and frequency is on the y axis. To a person from the field this signal is the most recognizable characteristic of a merger, known as a chirp. As time moves forward, the frequency shifts higher. You can actually listen to the 'raw' chirp here.

enter image description here


3
It's not behind a paywall because the paper is open content—it is licensed under CC BY 3.0.
bwDraco

@bwDraco Good point.
Chris Mueller

1
Can you explain why the H1 observation in the upper right plot is marked as "inverted"? I haven't seen anywhere else before remark that H1 is inverted, but I can clearly see that is the case. What's the reason for this?
zephyr

@zephyr: The two detectors are oriented differently (Hanford NW/SW, Livingston WSW/SSE), that might be the reason; I’m just guessing, though.
chirlu

13

LIGO didn't "see" anything. It monitors the relative lengths of the paths taken by two laser beams in vacuum pipes about 4km long (although the laser path consists of about 75 trips up and down the arms) and at right angles to each other.

A gravitational wave, travelling at the speed of light, changes the ratio of these lengths (one gets shorter, one gets larger, then they swap) by about plus or minus 1 part in 1021 (a billion trillion) about 30-200 times per second as it passes through the instrument.

The whole event lasted about 0.3 seconds and the trace (which has been all over the news) simply records the fraction by which the length of the arms changes as a function of time.

The event was (nearly) simultaneously recorded by two almost identical setups in different parts of the USA. The detection of the same signal in both detectors rules out a local cause of the disturbance, and the small time delay between the detections allows a rough location of the gravitational wave source on the sky.


To me, not only is it an amazing accomplishment that we could detect such a small signal, but we could actually predict ahead of time what the signal would look like. I'm flabbergasted that by using models scientist can be fairly certain that the wave was produced by two 30 solar mass black holes colliding (the first publicly released discovery). Einstein rules!!
Jack R. Woods

6

According to the GW150914 tutorial, this is what Advanced LIGO L1 and H1 detectors originally saw:

enter image description here

You can download the raw data from this tutorial.

The other answers show already processed (whitened, filtered, shifted by 7 ms, inverted) waveforms.


1
You are correct that this is what the raw data streams out of the detectors look like (note that I was careful in my answer to keep 'raw' in quotes). The sensitive band of the detectors ranges from 10 Hz to 100 kHz, but the raw data stream is dominated by the incredibly large (for LIGO) noise below 10 Hz. You can see this by comparing the units on your plot to those in the plots I posted. Part of the technologies LIGO employs to reach its unprecedented goal involve advanced signal processing.
Chris Mueller

你可以在这里看到周围的检测时检测器的实际噪声曲线:dcc.ligo.org/public/0119/G1500623/001/...
克里斯·米勒

3

LIGO使用的实际测量机制是激光干涉测量法,因此,对LIGO的“锯”的一种合理解释是重力波引起的干涉图,它看起来像这样:

enter image description here

不幸的是,我找不到LIGO提到的实际激光干扰的图像。无论如何,对于摄影来说,它可能太小了。

All the other graphs people are linking do are just graphs of the interference pattern data. Showing a graph of the LIGO data as an answer to this question is like showing an image histogram as an answer to the question, "What does the Hubble space telescope see?"


4
This is actually the interference pattern of two overlapping laser beams with different curvatures, and is what one might expect to see in a cheap interferometer (see e.g. Newton's rings). However, LIGO has incredibly well made mirrors so the interference at the output of the detector does not have any rings, and, in fact, is completely black on the scale of this image.
Chris Mueller

1

I don't know whether it's interesting for you, but here is the link of the paper that was published about those observations:

http://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

Once the answer above is quite straightforward! What the paper says (in short) is that LIGO has observed a transient gravitational-wave signal, and these observations match with the predictions of waveform derived by General Relativity for the system involving two black holes.


4
Welcome to Astronomy! However, link only answers are usually dis encouraged. If you have something new to add, please sum it up in a few paragraphs.
Hohmannfan

LIGO update: Rumors are out .. sciencenews.org/article/… .. that LIGO may have observed two colliding neutron stars. This would be significant since it could be the first time that gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves are seen from the same source.
Jack R. Woods
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required.