似乎所有这些答案都只是假设您可以从较大的对象中提取出很小的字符串...对于希望通过映射内部某处的此类字典简单地反分解大型对象的人，以及正在使用System.Runtime.Serialization.JsonDataContract系统的人们，这里一个解法：
gis.stackexchange.com上的答案具有此有趣的链接。我不得不通过archive.org恢复它，但是它提供了一个非常完美的解决方案：一个自定义IDataContractSurrogate类，您可以在其中实现完全自己的类型。我能够轻松扩展它。
不过，我做了很多修改。由于原始资源不再可用，因此我将在此处发布整个课程：
using System;
using System.CodeDom;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.Runtime.Serialization.Json;
using System.Text;
namespace JsonTools
{
/// <summary>
/// Allows using Dictionary<String,String> and Dictionary<String,Boolean> types, and any others you'd like to add.
/// Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20100317222656/my6solutions.com/post/2009/06/30/DataContractSerializer-DataContractJsonSerializer-JavaScriptSerializer-XmlSerializer-for-serialization.aspx
/// </summary>
public class JsonSurrogate : IDataContractSurrogate
{
/// <summary>
/// Deserialize an object with added support for the types defined in this class.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Contract class</typeparam>
/// <param name="json">JSON String</param>
/// <param name="encoding">Text encoding</param>
/// <returns>The deserialized object of type T</returns>
public static T Deserialize<T>(String json, Encoding encoding)
{
if (encoding == null)
encoding = new UTF8Encoding(false);
DataContractJsonSerializer deserializer = new DataContractJsonSerializer(
typeof(T), new Type[0], int.MaxValue, true, new JsonSurrogate(), false);
using (MemoryStream stream = new MemoryStream(encoding.GetBytes(json)))
{
T result = (T)deserializer.ReadObject(stream);
return result;
}
}
// make sure all values in this are classes implementing JsonSurrogateObject.
private static Dictionary<Type, Type> KnownTypes =
new Dictionary<Type, Type>()
{
{typeof(Dictionary<String, String>), typeof(SSDictionary)},
{typeof(Dictionary<String, Boolean>), typeof(SBDictionary)}
};
#region Implemented surrogate dictionary classes
[Serializable]
public class SSDictionary : SurrogateDictionary<String>
{
public SSDictionary() : base() {}
protected SSDictionary (SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context) : base(info, context) {}
}
[Serializable]
public class SBDictionary : SurrogateDictionary<Boolean>
{
public SBDictionary() : base() {}
protected SBDictionary (SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context) : base(info, context) {}
}
#endregion
/// <summary>Small interface to easily extract the final value from the object.</summary>
public interface JsonSurrogateObject
{
Object DeserializedObject { get; }
}
/// <summary>
/// Class for deserializing any simple dictionary types with a string as key.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Any simple type that will be deserialized correctly.</typeparam>
[Serializable]
public abstract class SurrogateDictionary<T> : ISerializable, JsonSurrogateObject
{
public Object DeserializedObject { get { return dict; } }
private Dictionary<String, T> dict;
public SurrogateDictionary()
{
dict = new Dictionary<String, T>();
}
// deserialize
protected SurrogateDictionary(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context)
{
dict = new Dictionary<String, T>();
foreach (SerializationEntry entry in info)
{
// This cast will only work for base types, of course.
dict.Add(entry.Name, (T)entry.Value);
}
}
// serialize
public void GetObjectData(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context)
{
foreach (String key in dict.Keys)
{
info.AddValue(key, dict[key]);
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Uses the KnownTypes dictionary to get the surrogate classes.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="type"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public Type GetDataContractType(Type type)
{
Type returnType;
if (KnownTypes.TryGetValue(type, out returnType))
{
return returnType;
}
return type;
}
public object GetObjectToSerialize(object obj, Type targetType)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets the object out of the surrogate datacontract object. This function is the reason all surrogate objects need to implement the JsonSurrogateObject class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="obj">Result of the deserialization</param>
/// <param name="targetType">Expected target type of the deserialization</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public object GetDeserializedObject(object obj, Type targetType)
{
if (obj is JsonSurrogateObject)
{
return ((JsonSurrogateObject)obj).DeserializedObject;
}
return obj;
}
public Type GetReferencedTypeOnImport(string typeName, string typeNamespace, object customData)
{
return null;
}
#region not implemented
public object GetCustomDataToExport(MemberInfo memberInfo, Type dataContractType)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public object GetCustomDataToExport(Type clrType, Type dataContractType)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public void GetKnownCustomDataTypes(Collection<Type> customDataTypes)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public CodeTypeDeclaration ProcessImportedType(CodeTypeDeclaration typeDeclaration, CodeCompileUnit compileUnit)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
#endregion
}
}
要将新支持的类型添加到类中，只需添加类，为其提供正确的构造函数和函数（请参见SurrogateDictionary示例），确保它继承JsonSurrogateObject，并将其类型映射添加到KnownTypes字典中。包含的SurrogateDictionary可以用作任何Dictionary<String,T>类型的基础，其中T是可以正确反序列化的任何类型。
调用非常简单：
MyObjtype newObj = JsonSurrogate.Deserialize<MyObjtype>(jsonStr, encoding);
注意，由于某种原因，这东西在使用包含空格的键字符串时会遇到麻烦；它们根本不在最终列表中。可能只是因为它只是针对json规范，而我正在调用的api实施得不好，请注意；我不知道。无论如何，我通过在原始json数据中用下划线替换它们并在反序列化后修复字典来解决此问题。
JavaScriptSerizlizer在ASP.NET MVC中使用，并且不再弃用。