Answers:
这是一个非常简单的实现Executor
(不要ExecutorService
介意),它仅使用当前线程。从“ Java并发实践”(必读)中窃取了该信息。
public class CurrentThreadExecutor implements Executor {
public void execute(Runnable r) {
r.run();
}
}
ExecutorService
是一个更复杂的界面,但可以使用相同的方法进行处理。
AbstractExecutorService
看起来像是要走的路。
Runnable::run
您可以使用番石榴MoreExecutors.newDirectExecutorService()
,MoreExecutors.directExecutor()
也可以不需要ExecutorService
。
如果包括Guava在内的应用程序过于繁琐,则可以实现几乎相同的功能:
public final class SameThreadExecutorService extends ThreadPoolExecutor {
private final CountDownLatch signal = new CountDownLatch(1);
private SameThreadExecutorService() {
super(1, 1, 0, TimeUnit.DAYS, new SynchronousQueue<Runnable>(),
new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy());
}
@Override public void shutdown() {
super.shutdown();
signal.countDown();
}
public static ExecutorService getInstance() {
return SingletonHolder.instance;
}
private static class SingletonHolder {
static ExecutorService instance = createInstance();
}
private static ExecutorService createInstance() {
final SameThreadExecutorService instance
= new SameThreadExecutorService();
// The executor has one worker thread. Give it a Runnable that waits
// until the executor service is shut down.
// All other submitted tasks will use the RejectedExecutionHandler
// which runs tasks using the caller's thread.
instance.submit(new Runnable() {
@Override public void run() {
boolean interrupted = false;
try {
while (true) {
try {
instance.signal.await();
break;
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
interrupted = true;
}
}
} finally {
if (interrupted) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
}
}});
return Executors.unconfigurableScheduledExecutorService(instance);
}
}
我写了一个ExecutorService
基于的AbstractExecutorService
。
/**
* Executes all submitted tasks directly in the same thread as the caller.
*/
public class SameThreadExecutorService extends AbstractExecutorService {
//volatile because can be viewed by other threads
private volatile boolean terminated;
@Override
public void shutdown() {
terminated = true;
}
@Override
public boolean isShutdown() {
return terminated;
}
@Override
public boolean isTerminated() {
return terminated;
}
@Override
public boolean awaitTermination(long theTimeout, TimeUnit theUnit) throws InterruptedException {
shutdown(); // TODO ok to call shutdown? what if the client never called shutdown???
return terminated;
}
@Override
public List<Runnable> shutdownNow() {
return Collections.emptyList();
}
@Override
public void execute(Runnable theCommand) {
theCommand.run();
}
}
terminated
字段将无法从基于此处实际代码的同步访问中受益。在Java中,对32位字段的操作是原子的。
为了测试目的,我不得不使用相同的“ CurrentThreadExecutorService”,尽管所有建议的解决方案都不错(尤其是提到Guava方式的解决方案),但我想出了与Peter Lawrey 在这里建议的类似的东西。
正如Axelle Ziegler 在此处提到的那样,不幸的是,Peter的解决方案实际上无法正常工作,因为ThreadPoolExecutor
在maximumPoolSize
构造函数参数上引入了检查(即maximumPoolSize
,不能是<=0
)。
为了避免这种情况,我做了以下工作:
private static ExecutorService currentThreadExecutorService() {
CallerRunsPolicy callerRunsPolicy = new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy();
return new ThreadPoolExecutor(0, 1, 0L, TimeUnit.SECONDS, new SynchronousQueue<Runnable>(), callerRunsPolicy) {
@Override
public void execute(Runnable command) {
callerRunsPolicy.rejectedExecution(command, this);
}
};
}
您可以使用RejectedExecutionHandler在当前线程中运行任务。
public static final ThreadPoolExecutor CURRENT_THREAD_EXECUTOR = new ThreadPoolExecutor(0, 0, 0, TimeUnit.DAYS, new SynchronousQueue<Runnable>(), new RejectedExecutionHandler() {
public void rejectedExecution(Runnable r, ThreadPoolExecutor executor) {
r.run();
}
});
您只需要其中之一。
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy
。